Skip to content
World clockEU--:--UK--:--USA--:--CN--:--PLDEFRIT中文EN

portal about AI and technologyevents · analysis · interviews · technical background

Search
LIVE
›

Chinese court freezes over $300m of Nexperia assets in Wingtech dispute

A Chinese court froze more than 2.14 billion yuan ($300 million) of Nexperia assets between 20 and 25 August, Wingtech disclosed in a Shanghai Stock Exchange filing on 31 August, in an ownership dispute that has disrupted chip supplies.

TechnologyAnalysisRachel NwosuPublished: 7 November 20265 min readSources 30
Chinese court freezes over $300m of Nexperia assets in Wingtech dispute

The Dongguan Intermediate People's Court ordered the freeze after an asset-preservation request from Wingtech and its subsidiary, according to the filing. The order covers Nexperia's 100% stakes in Nexperia Semiconductor China, Nexperia Semiconductor Wuxi and Nexperia Semiconductor Shanghai, plus 99% of Nexperia Semiconductor Technology Shanghai. It also froze the entire stake held by Nexperia's equipment unit in its Wuxi subsidiary.

Wingtech is seeking 8 billion yuan ($1.12 billion) in damages from Nexperia, its holding and equipment companies and three executives. The lawsuit, filed in May, alleges the defendants carried out or helped enforce what Wingtech calls "discriminatory restrictive measures" imposed by the Netherlands. The case has not gone to trial.

The freeze covers about a quarter of the damages Wingtech seeks. Reuters reported that the court action gives Wingtech more room to press its claim to regain control, though it does not change the company's management or resolve the broader ownership fight.

Nexperia said the measures "do not affect the day-to-day operations, management, or business continuity of Nexperia," adding that the case has not been heard on its merits. Nexperia makes chips widely used in automobiles, consumer electronics and industrial equipment.

The dispute behind the order

The freeze is the latest step in a fight that began after the Dutch government took control of Nexperia in 2025. The Ministry of Economic Affairs invoked the Goods Availability Act on 30 September 2025 and made the decision public on 12 October, Data Center Dynamics reported. The ministry cited "serious governance shortcomings" that it said posed a threat to the continuity and safeguarding of technological knowledge and capabilities on Dutch and European soil.

The 1952 law had never been used. It lets the state block or reverse management decisions for a year without taking ownership. Vincent Karremans, the economy minister, told broadcaster NOS he had received "serious and urgent signals that the company has major shortcomings that could jeopardise security of supply."

Court papers released after the takeover showed US officials warned the Netherlands in June 2025 that Nexperia might not be able to export to the US if Zhang remained in post, the Guardian reported. Wingtech, which bought Nexperia from Philips, called the Dutch move "excessive interference driven by geopolitical bias." The Dutch ministry denied US involvement, calling the timing "purely coincidental," the Times of India reported.

Nexperia's European directors went to court on 1 October 2025, and a judge suspended Zhang Xuezheng with immediate effect, IO+ reported. The Enterprise Chamber suspended him on 6 October, the same outlet said. By the time the takeover was made public, Zhang had already been suspended, the Guardian reported.

Supply fallout and next steps

China responded with export controls on Nexperia's China operations, disrupting shipments, Reuters reported. The South China Morning Post reported that Nexperia's main China factory cut production, with one worker saying about one-third of the machines on his production floor had been idle for about a week because of a shortage of wafers normally supplied by Nexperia's fabs in Germany and the UK.

Nexperia China told employees they no longer needed to follow instructions from Dutch headquarters, IO+ reported. Wingtech warned that "a Nexperia without its Chinese divisions is doomed," saying the company would lose most of its chip production.

Reuters reported that after talks between Beijing and The Hague, China agreed to allow supplies to resume and the Netherlands suspended its order. Wingtech has not recovered the voting control it lost, leaving the underlying corporate dispute unresolved.

The equity freezes run until August 2029. Wingtech said it would "exhaust all legal means" to restore full control of Nexperia and safeguard investors' interests.

Comments 0

Sources

30
  1. 01Chinese court freezes over $300M in Nexperia assets amid Wingtech disputeEN
  2. 02Chinese court freezes $300 million of Nexperia assets in Wingtech caseEN
  3. 03Chinese court freezes $300 million of Nexperia assets in Wingtech caseEN
  4. 04Wingtech seeks over $1b in damages from Dutch chipmaker NexperiaEN
  5. 05Netherlands Invokes Emergency Law to Regain Control of NexperiaEN
  6. 06US raised concerns about Chinese boss of chipmaker before Dutch takeoverEN
  7. 07Nexperia owner demands control back after Dutch interferenceEN
  8. 08Dutch government takes control of Chinese-owned chipmaker NexperiaEN
  9. 09Netherlands government invokes 'emergency powers' to take control of Chinese chip company banned by AmericaEN
  10. 10Nexperia's China factory cuts output as Dutch takeover deepens global chip supply tensionsEN
  11. 11Dutch government seizes control of Chinese-owned chipmaker NexperiaEN
  12. 12TSMC is weighing a move into AI memory chips at Nvidia’s requestEN
  13. 13 Nvidia tightens tracking of AI GPUs in Southeast Asia as Chinese chip smuggling draws scrutiny, report claims EN
  14. 14 Intel’s next-gen Nova Lake needs new motherboards — what we expect from Nova Point and Z990, Z970, and B960 chipsets EN
  15. 15Chip Industry Week In ReviewEN
  16. 16Künstliche Intelligenz: EU will Chips aus Europa mit halber Milliarde Euro fördernEN
  17. 17 Apple MacBook Pro (14-inch, M6) review: Speedy M6 chip slips into comfortable shoes EN
  18. 18Inside the chip talent war: Trade secrets and rising Chinese rivalsEN
  19. 19 Nintendo ROM chip supplier Macronix quits to focus on chips for AI data centers, reports indicate EN
  20. 20 Nvidia can only fulfill 1% of China’s massive $70 billion GPU order for AI chips, report claims EN
  21. 21Accelerating Plug-And-Play Prototyping In Chiplet-Based DesignsEN
  22. 22China’s AI chipmakers report first profits, but will the trend continue?EN
  23. 23Europe’s Chip Industry: Perfect Storm or Perfect Timing?EN
  24. 24Chinese chipmaker Hua Hong bets big on silicon photonics amid AI boomEN
  25. 25China’s CXMT defends bet on risky new DRAM architecture to circumvent US chip curbsEN
  26. 26As AI cyber risks grow, Chinese chip expert urges shared ethics standards with US rivalsEN
  27. 27AI, fuelled by advanced chips, set to power semiconductor manufacturing: industry veteranEN
  28. 28Chinese AI chipmaker Iluvatar CoreX says new GPU matches Nvidia’s H200 as chip gap closesEN
  29. 29Oracle Cloud to Offer Google TPUs and New AI ChipsEN
  30. 30Huawei’s Tau Scaling Law roll-out reaches base stations in blow to US chip curbsEN

All figures and quotations in this text come from the sources listed below.

Content prepared by the editorial team with AI assistance.

Rachel Nwosu

Rachel Nwosu

AI, models and technology

Rachel Nwosu covers AI, models and technology for FLASH24, working from public model documentation, benchmark releases and repository histories rather than press summaries, and she skips announcements that arrive without reproducible numbers. She checks training-data claims against dataset cards and reruns reported metrics where code is available. She spends much of her week interviewing researchers and engineers, tracking model launch calendars, and comparing vendor benchmarks with independent evaluations. Outside the desk she runs 3D printers, restores old computers, and tests how models learn from internet junk. She does not publish benchmark figures she cannot trace to a source.

Newsroom →

Comments

0
  1. No comments yet — be the first.

Write a comment

Comments are public. We do not publish abuse, spam or advertising.