Skip to content
World clockEU--:--UK--:--USA--:--CN--:--PLDEFRIT中文EN

portal about AI and technologyevents · analysis · interviews · technical background

Search
LIVE
›

Google will cut off Search for schools that refuse AI features in Search from early 2027

Google said on Tuesday that schools which want Google Search without AI Overviews will lose Search from early 2027, a policy it defended as giving schools "more choice, not less" after politicians called it extortion.

TechnologyNewsRachel NwosuPublished: 4 November 20264 min readSources 28
Google will cut off Search for schools that refuse AI features in Search from early 2027

What Google actually changed

From early 2027, Gemini, Gemini Notebook and Google Search will be off by default for K-12 student accounts, and school administrators will have to switch on each one individually. The change covers kindergarten through the end of secondary school.

Chris Phillips, Google's vice president for education, told the New York Times that "Search and AI are deeply integrated", so a school that blocks AI leaves its students without search at all: they "will not have access to search, and they'll see a message from their school that indicates it's not available". NBC News reported that schools can enable Search without the Gemini products, but AI-generated summaries stay inside it. A version of Search without AI is not on offer.

The Decoder reported that Google had recently flipped AI features on by default inside Classroom for schools with Gemini access, a move that drew the backlash it is now reversing.

The backlash

Senator Bernie Sanders called the policy "extortion".

New York mayor Zohran Mamdani wrote on social media that Google is "trying to use its monopoly power to force AI into our public schools", adding that "no corporation should have the power to dictate how we teach our children". Former FTC chair Lina Khan said the move showed "the danger of allowing an unregulated monopolist to control an essential service". Senator Richard Blumenthal said Google is "more concerned with forcing Gemini into schools than enabling students to succeed". He and Senator Josh Hawley opened an inquiry last month into Google's push of AI into classrooms.

Google answered later in the day with a post on X, saying the policy was meant to give schools "more choice, not less". It said administrators could turn on one, two or all three of the services individually.

Common Sense Media rated Google's AI Overviews an "unacceptable risk" for children and teenagers.

Why Search and AI cannot be split

Google considers AI Overviews and AI Mode inseparable from traditional search. CNBC reported that AI Overviews arrived as a search feature in May 2024, and AI Mode, launched last year, brings chatbot functionality directly into results.

That is the crux of the fight. Schools are not being offered a search box with an AI add-on, because the AI is now the product.

Guided Learning and the opt-in menu

Google announced the change alongside Guided Learning, a mode that walks students through the steps of a problem instead of handing over the answer. It is live worldwide in Classroom now, and a pilot in selected US schools starts in November. Schools that enable Search get one of two versions: full AI Overviews and AI chat, or Guided Learning.

Google says it consulted schools, teachers, researchers and policymakers before making the change.

Who benefits

DuckDuckGo moved quickly. The privacy-focused search engine published instructions for switching a school's default search engine, and its chief executive, Gabriel Weinberg, told schools to "get in touch for help". Its chief public affairs officer, Kamyl Bazbaz, was blunter: "Forcing AI on school children: how a monopolist behaves when they think people are powerless. Prove Google wrong."

The opening is real. Google has said around 50 million Chromebooks are in schools, and Classroom serves more than 150 million users globally. DuckDuckGo reported earlier this year that its app installs were up 30% as users pushed back on Google's AI Search. It also runs a separate site, noai.duckduckgo.com, where AI answers, AI images and AI suggestions are all switched off. For millions of students required to use Chromebooks and Google education tools, using a different search engine isn't a simple fix, TechCrunch reported. DuckDuckGo's pitch is that it, unlike Google, lets users disable its AI features in search and browser settings.

What happens next

Google says it will share specifics with schools in the coming months ahead of the early-2027 rollout. Los Angeles Unified says it is still reviewing the potential implications, WIRED reported. New York City and Los Angeles had already pulled back on student AI in September, and Los Angeles wanted to keep Google Search without AI Overviews. Google won't let it, according to The Decoder.

Comments 0

Sources

28
  1. 01Google Tries to Walk Back Controversial School AI Policy Following Political BacklashEN
  2. 02Google will let schools skip AI tools, but they have to give up search, tooEN
  3. 03Google faces backlash for plan that would turn off Search for schools that restrict AIEN
  4. 04Google responds to political backlash over removing search from schools that ban AIEN
  5. 05Google will let schools disable its AI tools, but not without sacrificing SearchEN
  6. 06Schools that turn off Google's AI will lose search too starting in 2027EN
  7. 07Google: Internetsuche gibt es für Schulen nur, wenn KI-Tools freigegeben sindDE
  8. 08Google Is Forcing AI Overviews in Classrooms. Schools Are Searching for a Way OutEN
  9. 09DuckDuckGo pitches itself to schools amid backlash over Google's AI policyEN
  10. 10UK Officials Said AI Would Add £400 Billion to the Economy. That Figure Mainly Came From GoogleEN
  11. 11Goldman, Apollo in Talks to Sell SpaceX’s $40 Billion AI DealEN
  12. 12Google Pixel 11, 11 Pro, and 11 Pro XL Sale: Save Up to $350EN
  13. 13The Lawyer Holding Big Tech Accountable by ‘Beating the Tar Out of Them’ in CourtEN
  14. 14Google will spend $15B on data centres in Malaysia over two yearsEN
  15. 15Google’s Pixel 11 phones are up to 27 percent offEN
  16. 16 Certified Android TV manufacturer put unauthorized backdoor in 1.3 million set-top boxes, Google reveals EN
  17. 17Binance attackers used fake job interviews to pull off $6.3 billion crypto heistEN
  18. 18Binance Says Hackers Used Well-Known Tricks to Carry Out a $6.34 Billion HeistEN
  19. 19Binance co-CEO Richard Teng says hackers used fake job interviews, AI tool to steal $6.3 billion in crypto EN
  20. 20Meta seeks to raise up to $25 billion in debt sale as AI spending jumpsEN
  21. 21Google dismantles botnet secretly running on 1.3 million Android TV boxesEN
  22. 22 Google reveals new Gemini 4 Carbon AI model, narrowly beating Claude Opus 5.5 EN
  23. 23Ex-Phoenix Court partner launches $17M debut solo fund to discover next LovableEN
  24. 24Google Calendar phishing campaign hijacks sessions, bypasses MFAEN
  25. 25‘A serious failure’: CPS prosecutor cites imaginary case to court after AI searchEN
  26. 26$150 Billion More Paid by Americans for Gas This Year Than LastEN
  27. 27 Google data center wins approval in Minnesota after protests delay council vote twice EN
  28. 28Google admits AI search makes less money, but it's fixing that with more adsEN

All figures and quotations in this text come from the sources listed below.

Content prepared by the editorial team with AI assistance.

Rachel Nwosu

Rachel Nwosu

AI, models and technology

Rachel Nwosu covers AI, models and technology for FLASH24, working from public model documentation, benchmark releases and repository histories rather than press summaries, and she skips announcements that arrive without reproducible numbers. She checks training-data claims against dataset cards and reruns reported metrics where code is available. She spends much of her week interviewing researchers and engineers, tracking model launch calendars, and comparing vendor benchmarks with independent evaluations. Outside the desk she runs 3D printers, restores old computers, and tests how models learn from internet junk. She does not publish benchmark figures she cannot trace to a source.

Newsroom →

Comments

0
  1. No comments yet — be the first.

Write a comment

Comments are public. We do not publish abuse, spam or advertising.