Tencent's Hy4 joins a benchmark race where cost and proof matter more
Tencent announced Hy4 on 4 November and will publish its weights and system cards in the coming days. The launch comes as Google's Gemini 4 Carbon tops one independent index by a single point.

Tencent opens its latest model
The release matters less for its features than for comparison shopping. Buyers now weigh Google's index-topping Gemini 4 Carbon against an open-weight model Tencent says will be downloadable. They also weigh Gartner's estimate that open models handle most agentic work at a fraction of frontier cost.
The pitch is broad. Hy4 adds visual understanding and computer-use capabilities for the first time. It can work through command-line and graphical interfaces. Tencent says it trained the model on professional software including Blender and CAD. The aim is long, multi-step tasks. On Tencent's WorkBuddy assistant, the company reports an average performance score of 83.18 and a pass rate of 96.15 percent. Hy4 ranked first in nine of twelve scenarios in mainland China. A blind evaluation run with Tencent Financial Technology used 213 financial professionals. Of those, 153 came from outside institutions. The run covered 579 tasks.
Every one of those figures comes from Tencent's own testing. No outside benchmarker produced them. Open weights change the terms of that comparison. That holds if Tencent publishes what it promised. Buyers can then run the model themselves and check the claims.
Google takes the benchmark crown, narrowly
Tom's Hardware reported that Gemini 4 Carbon scored 59 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index V5. That put it one point ahead of Claude Opus 5.5. It was two points ahead of OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra.
Gemini 4 Carbon took the top score on four of the nine evaluations in the suite. It did so at a lower cost per task than other high-ranked models. It also sits nine points clear of Meta's Muse Wonder Full. It is not best at everything. Tom's Hardware noted it trails Claude Code with Claude Opus 5.5 on programming. It also falls behind Grok 4.7, Muse Wonder and Kimi K3.1 Pro on knowledge work.
The margin is thin. Thin is normal. Rankings on that index have moved fast and often through 2026. A single point is not a durable lead. What Google can point to is price. Gemini 4 Carbon cost $7.76 per task on the Intelligence Index test. That is cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5. It is roughly half the $12.99 of Claude Fable 5.1. It is still dearer than OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra. It costs about six times as much as GPT 6.1 Sol.
On AA-Omniscience v1.1, it scored 54. That benchmark tracks knowledge recall and hallucination. The score sits on a scale running from -100 to +100. Even the best frontier model of late 2026 is a long way from reliable recall.
The cost argument
Gartner reckons open models can handle 90 percent of agentic work. That is at a twentieth of the cost of a frontier LLM, The Register reported.
Put that next to the price list and the trade-off gets concrete. Gemini 4 Carbon's $7.76 per task is about 13 times what open-weight DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs. That model scores 32 on the Intelligence Index. Buyers are choosing how much accuracy they need per unit of work. They are also asking whether a benchmark gap of a few points justifies a multiple on price.
Google's own framing leans on security work. It is giving cyber defenders access first through its Fairwind program. Wider availability comes later. Most buyers cannot test the top-ranked model yet.
What to watch: weights, access and proof
Anthropic published a blog post on Tuesday describing FlashProve. FlashProve is an open-source system for verifying which model produced a given output. It works by having labs publish a fingerprint of each model. Labs can match that fingerprint to outputs and check it cryptographically. The check does not reveal the weights.
The researchers released a technical specification and working code on GitHub. They said they have no plans to deploy it at Anthropic or any other lab. That makes it a proposal, not a product. Still, the problem it addresses is real for buyers. A company could claim an appropriate model approved its business plan. Or it could claim a frontier security model scanned a library. A customer would have no way to confirm it, the researchers write.
For now, the practical questions are simpler. Tencent says Hy4's weights and system cards arrive in the coming days. Google says Gemini 4 Carbon will reach wider availability after the Fairwind program. Until then, the benchmark claims stand largely as their makers published them.
Sources
28- 01Tencent Launches Hy4, Joining the Ranks of the World's Leading Open-Source AI ModelsEN
- 02Google reveals new Gemini 4 Carbon AI model, narrowly beating Claude Opus 5.5EN
- 03Open models can do 90% of agentic work at a twentieth of the cost of a frontier LLM: GartnerEN
- 04Anthropic is working on a system to prove AI models' identityEN
- 05Updates für viele Modelle: Xiaomi beginnt mit der Verteilung von HyperOS 4.0EN
- 06Valve just changed its Steam release rules amid a flood of AI gamesEN
- 07BYD teases new model for Guangzhou Auto Show, with next-gen Han expectedEN
- 08Nvidia is happy to take your money whether you're using open or closed models, says Jensen HuangEN
- 09Envision's Tianji Weather Foundation Model Tops ECMWF's AI Weather Quest, Setting a New Global Benchmark for Physics-AI Forecasting - Yahoo! Finance CanadaEN
- 10I Checked Out Tesla’s New Model YL, Standard Y, Model 3 In Person — Here’s What Surprised MeEN
- 11heise+ | Humanoide Roboter in Deutschland: Modelle, Preise und VerfügbarkeitEN
- 12Jülich Hosts EVE Language Model for Earth Observation and Earth ScienceEN
- 13SemiAnalysis unveils GDPx benchmark, and the best AI model scores 12%EN
- 14Tutor Intelligence raises Series B to scale model training, robot deploymentsEN
- 15Westward Ho! First Trip Cross Country with Our New 2026 Tesla Model Y & Full Self Driving V14EN
- 16Google Launches LiteRT Tensor API for Building, Customizing, and Optimizing ML Models for On-DeviceEN
- 17SigmaCore.ai Benchmark Study Reveals Standard AI Achieves Only 63.5% Accuracy in Financial Mathematics - MorningstarEN
- 18Red Hat Patches 9.8-Rated Linux TCP RCE Flaw While Ubuntu Releases Fixes for TestingEN
- 19Was I wrong about open models & cyber risks?EN
- 20Artificial Analysis v5 and the benchmarker's dilemmaEN
- 21China touts AI milestone: models generate more tokens than used in trainingEN
- 22GDPx AI Benchmark Tops Out at 12% as Claude Opus 5.5 LeadsEN
- 23Final release for the 7.2 stable seriesEN
- 24V0.5.0 of PSSA: a non-transformer language modelEN
- 25File Mover Express: AWS Releases Open-Source Tool for S3 File TransfersEN
- 26What is Gemini 4 Carbon, Google’s new AI model for finding, fixing security flaws?EN
- 27Spring News Roundup: First Release Candidates of Boot, Framework, Data, Security, Modulith, AIEN
- 28Anthropic's Claude AI blocks video game cloning and reverse-engineeringEN
All figures and quotations in this text come from the sources listed below.
Content prepared by the editorial team with AI assistance.
Comments
0- No comments yet — be the first.