Skip to content
World clockEU--:--UK--:--USA--:--CN--:--PLDEFRIT中文EN

portal about AI and technologyevents · analysis · interviews · technical background

Search
LIVE
›

UC Berkeley-led study identifies DNA from two unknown archaic human groups in living people

A UC Berkeley-led study published in Science on 30 July 2026 used a method called TRACE to find DNA from two unknown archaic human groups, including a ghost lineage present in all modern humans, in hundreds of present-day genomes.

ScienceExplainerSofia MarchettiPublished: 6 November 20263 min readSources 13
UC Berkeley-led study identifies DNA from two unknown archaic human groups in living people

The ghost ancestor interbred with modern humans in Africa more than 50,000 years ago, before the most recent major migration of Homo sapiens out of Africa, the researchers report. DNA inherited from this lineage makes up approximately 1% of the modern human genome, an amount the researchers describe as comparable to the Neanderthal contribution.

How the DNA was traced

The Berkeley team developed a technique called TRACE, for TRacking Archaic Contributions via ARG Estimation. It analyzes hundreds of complete genomes from present-day humans around the world and reconstructs an ancestral recombination graph, a map of how DNA segments are related through shared ancestry over time. The method identifies regions whose ancestry extends unusually far back, allowing the team to locate DNA from extinct populations even without ancient DNA from them. Earlier studies had found hints of such interbreeding but had not mapped where the traces sat. “Genealogies preserve a record of our evolutionary past,” said Priya Moorjani, a Berkeley associate professor of molecular and cell biology. “TRACE reconstructs those histories across the genome. By identifying regions whose ancestry extends unusually far back in time, we can uncover genetic contributions from extinct human populations, even in the absence of ancient DNA.”

The analysis points to interbreeding between modern humans and at least four archaic human relatives, among them Neanderthals and Denisovans.

The ghost ancestor in Africa

The ghost lineage split from the modern human line around 800,000 years ago, close to when Neanderthals and Denisovans diverged from each other. The interbreeding happened before 50,000 years ago, earlier than the Neanderthal and Denisovan encounters outside Africa.

Most people outside Africa carry about 1 to 2% Neanderthal DNA.

“We were actually able to find and map genomic locations in modern humans that are from this ghost lineage and show that this ghost ancestry is in all modern humans, not only in Africans,” said Yulin Zhang, a Berkeley graduate student and one of two first authors.

The super-archaic ancestor

The second group is older still. The researchers describe a super-archaic ancestor whose lineage dates back about 1.8 million years. It probably interbred with Denisovans in Eurasia more than 200,000 years ago. Denisovans later mixed with Homo sapiens, which is how a small slice of that older DNA reached modern genomes. “The super-archaic finding is particularly exciting because it reveals genetic contributions from a human lineage that lived over a million years ago, despite the absence of any sequenced DNA from that population,” said Arjun Biddanda, a postdoctoral researcher at Johns Hopkins University and a co-first author.

What the dates line up with

The inferred divergence dates overlap with the existence of Middle Pleistocene Homo groups in Africa around 800,000 years ago and Homo erectus populations in Eurasia around 1.8 million years ago, the researchers said.

Priya Moorjani, an associate professor of molecular and cell biology at Berkeley, said in a university release that mixture among human populations has been pervasive across time. “We often think of human evolution as a branching tree, but new genomic data and analytical methods reveal a much more interconnected history - more like a complex web of populations connected by repeated episodes of migration and mixing,” she said.

The authors argue that early Homo sapiens lived alongside numerous related hominin groups in Africa and Eurasia over the past million years. They were close enough genetically to interbreed with many of them.

What is still open

The study does not identify the two populations, and neither has been tied to a sequenced genome. The inferred dates overlap with known groups, but that overlap does not establish identity. Without DNA from either population, the identities remain unresolved.

Comments 0

Sources

13
  1. 01Scientists found two mysterious 'ghost' ancestors hiding in our DNAEN
  2. 02Mysterious DNA: two unknown ancestors found in human genomeEN
  3. 03New computational technique traces ghost ancestry in modern human genomesEN
  4. 04Ancient "Ghost" Ancestors Left Their Mark on the Human GenomeEN
  5. 05Genomes Across Japan Reveal Traces of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA — and a Hidden Third Ancestry - Discover MagazineEN
  6. 06Neanderthal genes give clues to human brain evolution: StudyEN
  7. 07In 50,000 years, one ancient love story left an uneven genetic signature: Scientists say Neanderthal fathers may have contributed far more surviving descendantsEN
  8. 08A new study suggests that human women and Neanderthal men interbred much more frequently than previously thought, which rewrites part of the history of our origEN
  9. 09Max Planck scientists read DNA from 27 late Neanderthals in Belgium and France and found no sign of recent Homo sapiens ancestry, even though both lived in EuroEN
  10. 10HuBMAP Updates Data Portal for Studying Human Tissues at Single-Cell ResolutionEN
  11. 1175,000-year-old Neanderthal may have been killed by a spear aimed at the heartEN
  12. 12What happened to the Neanderthals? - Inquirer.comEN
  13. 13Studying Fraudulent North Korean IT WorkersEN

All figures and quotations in this text come from the sources listed below.

Content prepared by the editorial team with AI assistance.

Sofia Marchetti

Sofia Marchetti

Science and health

Sofia Marchetti covers science and health for FLASH24, working from primary literature, preprints, and agency data rather than press releases. She checks sample sizes, confidence intervals, and whether a study's numbers match its abstract before filing. She interviews researchers and clinicians directly, tracks conference calendars for embargoed results, and compares new findings with earlier trials on the same question. Outside the newsroom she works on materials physics and stargazes through a home telescope, which keeps her close to how measurement error actually behaves. She does not publish a health claim without a named source and the underlying data.

Newsroom →

Comments

0
  1. No comments yet — be the first.

Write a comment

Comments are public. We do not publish abuse, spam or advertising.