FDA extends Capricor's deramiocel decision date to 22 November
The FDA moved its decision date for Capricor Therapeutics' deramiocel to 22 November from 22 August, after advisers voted 9-3 against the Duchenne muscular dystrophy cardiomyopathy indication and Capricor narrowed its proposed use to upper-limb function.

The FDA reclassified Capricor's submission as a major amendment after the company added 24-month open-label extension data from the phase 3 HOPE-3 trial. The amendment also asks the agency to review existing and new data for a narrower use: upper-limb impairment in patients older than 9 years, rather than DMD cardiomyopathy. Capricor's shares rose as much as 16% on the morning of 24 August and were worth $7.05 at the time of publication.
Advisers voted against the cardiomyopathy indication
The FDA's Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee voted 9 to 3, with no abstentions, on 29 July 2026 that the evidence did not provide substantial evidence of effectiveness for deramiocel in DMD cardiomyopathy. The vote is nonbinding. Members who voted no cited results that shifted with different imputation strategies and patient inclusions. "We have markedly fragile results that can be changed with different imputation strategies [and] different inclusions of different people," said John Teerlink, a cardiologist on the panel. Janet Turk Wittes, a biostatistician, said the data were "very fragile" and "dependent on one or two people." Some members also questioned whether LVEF, as measured in the trial, is a validated surrogate for clinical benefit, and raised a possible safety signal tied to increases in left ventricular volume.
FDA reviewers wrote in briefing documents released on 27 July that HOPE-3 "did not meet its pre-specified primary and secondary efficacy endpoints," showing no statistically significant difference from placebo at 12 months. The agency said the statistical analysis plan was changed after the randomized portion finished and during the open-label extension, producing at least two versions beyond the original. Capricor chief executive Linda Marbán said results are governed by SAP version 3.0, finalized before unblinding, and that the FDA's post-hoc analyses rely on SAP version 1.1, which she called an unsigned incomplete internal draft.
Capricor's stock fell from a 24 July close of $19.83 to a 27 July open of $5.87, a drop of just over 70%, after the briefing documents were published. It closed at $6.57 on 29 July.
What Capricor presented
Deramiocel is an allogeneic cardiosphere-derived cell therapy given by intravenous infusion. Capricor says it works through immunomodulatory and antifibrotic effects, not by replacing dystrophin. No therapy is approved specifically for DMD-associated cardiomyopathy, which is eventually fatal.
HOPE-3 enrolled 106 participants at 20 US sites. In the prespecified percent-change analysis of the PUL 2.0 upper-limb scale, deramiocel showed a 4.55% improvement versus placebo; an absolute-score sensitivity analysis put the difference at 1.1 points. Craig McDonald, the national principal investigator at UC Davis, said the FDA and investigators in the field have regarded a one-point PUL 2.0 difference as clinically meaningful. The Lancet published the trial results, using Capricor's amended outcome measures, during the advisory meeting; the paper reported a 54% slowing of upper-limb disease progression.
Pooled across HOPE-2 and HOPE-3, the analysis covered 62 deramiocel-treated patients and 64 on placebo with PUL assessments. Nathaniel Hogan, Capricor's lead biostatistician, reported a 1.29-point difference favoring deramiocel at 12 months, with a P value of 0.0087. He said the company ran more than 600 alternative analyses of HOPE-3, and that "the vast majority" showed a treatment benefit at or above one point.
In the 64 of 106 HOPE-3 participants with impaired cardiac function at entry, Capricor reported a 2.8 percentage point treatment effect on LVEF at 12 months. In the pooled analysis, the LVEF difference was 2.2 points in the full population and 3.1 points among patients with cardiomyopathy at baseline. Patients on deramiocel for two years in the open-label extension had a 3.4-point decline in PUL 2.0, against a modeled 5.88-point decline drawn from published natural-history data and prognostic models. That comparison is open-label and against external data, not a randomized control.
How the application got here
The FDA issued a complete response letter for deramiocel in July 2025, saying the data fell short of the statutory requirement for substantial evidence of effectiveness. A scheduled 30 July 2025 advisory committee meeting was canceled in June 2025; Marbán told BioSpace she was blindsided by the decision. Capricor reported topline HOPE-3 results in December 2025, saying the trial met its primary and secondary endpoints. The FDA's reviewers later read the same trial as a failure. The agency accepted the resubmission in March 2026 and set a target action date of 22 August 2026.
That date passed without word. The agency then granted the three-month extension. Marbán said in a statement that the additional open-label data and further analyses "strengthen the evidence supporting a refined proposed indication."
What happens next
The action date is 22 November. Marbán has said Capricor would pursue a heart indication for deramiocel later. The company has said it will halt all other pipeline work until it receives further regulatory clarity on deramiocel. Shareholder Kaos Capital objected to that plan in a 21 August letter, writing that "conviction in a lead program is not a license for a Board to concentrate all of a public company's capital, risk, and future in a single regulatory outcome."
Sources
13- 01Capricor Highlights Two-Year Deramiocel Data as FDA Decision NearsEN
- 02CAPR Stock Rises Nearly 5% As Capricor Presents Heart Data For Deramiocel Ahead Of November FDA DecisionEN
- 03Capricor Highlights Two-Year Deramiocel Data as FDA Decision NearsEN
- 04Capricor's Duchenne therapy has new life after FDA grants 3-month extensionEN
- 05FDA Disputes Capricor's Phase 3 Efficacy Claims for Duchenne Cell Therapy DeramiocelEN
- 06FDA advisors vote no to Capricor's DMD therapyEN
- 07FDA AdCom shuns Capricor's DMD cell therapy amid data disputeEN
- 08FDA Advisory Committee Votes Against Deramiocel for DMD CardiomyopathyEN
- 09Capricor thrown for another loop as FDA sets adcomm for DMD cardiomyopathy therapyEN
- 10Capricor's Deramiocel Briefing Is a Masterclass in How Not to Define an EndpointEN
- 11Capricor Faces FDA Advisory Review for DMD TherapyEN
- 12STAT+: Novartis cites cases of previously unknown tumors possibly tied to its SMA gene therapyEN
- 13How Do Artificial Agents Make Decisions in Light of Visual Data?EN
All figures and quotations in this text come from the sources listed below.
Content prepared by the editorial team with AI assistance.
Comments
0- No comments yet — be the first.