Skip to content
World clockEU--:--UK--:--USA--:--CN--:--PLDEFRIT中文EN

portal about AI and technologyevents · analysis · interviews · technical background

Search
LIVE
›

Temple's heart rate claim rests on a study the company ran itself

Temple's claim that its head-worn device beats the Apple Watch on heart rate accuracy rests on a study the company funded, ran and analysed itself, The Economic Times reported. The white paper, published on 31 October, has not been peer reviewed.

HealthExplainerSofia MarchettiPublished: 4 November 20263 min readSources 15
Temple's heart rate claim rests on a study the company ran itself

Buyers paying ₹85,000 for the device are being asked to trust a company-run result. No independent lab has tested the claim, and first shipments are not due until early 2027. If it holds, a head-worn optical sensor could give athletes another option in the high-intensity zones where wrist devices struggle. If it fails, the launch loses its main selling point.

What Temple claims

Deepinder Goyal posted the claim on X on 1 November, hours before pre-orders opened. He said accurate tracking is not a solved problem. "You would think accurate HR (Heart Rate) tracking is a solved problem. It is not. Especially in zones 4 & 5, which matter to professional athletes the most," he wrote.

Temple says its device recorded the lowest heart rate measurement error at rest and across five exercise zones. The comparison covered the Apple Watch Series 12, Garmin Forerunner 970, Fitbit Air, Whoop MG and Oura Ring 5. The Apple Watch Series 12 came closest, the company says. Goyal credits two design choices: an adhesive that keeps the sensor on the skin, and placement at the temple, over a major artery. "Temple uses adhesive, so its lab condition is its wear condition. You'll experience our study outcomes in real life," he said.

Temple sells the device as a wellness monitor rather than a medical one. It uses optical sensors the company calls BrainFlow and produces an Entropy score from 1 to 250. The target is elite athletes, starting with heart rate.

How the test was run

The reference device was a Polar H10 chest strap. Temple taped it to the chest because the usual placement can lose contact during sprints and miss heartbeats.

The study was single-site, in Gurugram, with one session per participant and treadmill running only. Cycling, strength training, outdoor running and everyday activity were not tested. Tech Insider said sample sizes and beats-per-minute error figures were not disclosed.

Temple says the full paper and data are on its website. It also says the device beat an untaped Polar H10 in zones 4 and 5. Tech Insider noted that a claim about hard exercise is narrower than a general accuracy claim.

What happens next

Temple says independent researchers are running an extended study. It has invited replication and offered to fund it. Until those results appear, the claim remains a company result.

Comments 0

Sources

15
  1. 01Deepinder Goyal's Temple claims it beat Apple Watch, Oura, Whoop on heart-rate accuracy testEN
  2. 02Temple beats Apple Watch: Deepinder Goyal says his wearable device delivers better heart rate accuracyEN
  3. 03Can Deepinder Goyal's Temple beat Apple Watch? New study claims accuracy advantageEN
  4. 04Temple Heart Rate Wearable: Goyal's 1 Claim Tested [2026]EN
  5. 05Deepinder Goyal claims Temple wearable beats Apple Watch in heart rate accuracy, here's how it worksEN
  6. 06Wearable devices + AI analysis may predict high blood pressure crisis up to 3 days early - www.heart.orgEN
  7. 07Rapid LLM development is outrunning the research meant to explain it, study findsEN
  8. 08How to choose the right gaming monitor for youEN
  9. 09 Snag this 360Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor for only $349 EN
  10. 10Liom Advances Non-Invasive Glucose Monitoring with Wearable PhotonicsEN
  11. 11 Gamer's Asus TUF monitor blocks bullet fired through wall during Call of Duty session EN
  12. 1275,000-year-old Neanderthal may have been killed by a spear aimed at the heartEN
  13. 13Opening the Box Changes the Cat: LLMs Detect Chain-of-Thought Monitoring - What now?EN
  14. 14Studying Fraudulent North Korean IT WorkersEN
  15. 15Exercise doesn't just strengthen your heart. It rewires itEN

All figures and quotations in this text come from the sources listed below.

Content prepared by the editorial team with AI assistance.

Sofia Marchetti

Sofia Marchetti

Science and health

Sofia Marchetti covers science and health for FLASH24, working from primary literature, preprints, and agency data rather than press releases. She checks sample sizes, confidence intervals, and whether a study's numbers match its abstract before filing. She interviews researchers and clinicians directly, tracks conference calendars for embargoed results, and compares new findings with earlier trials on the same question. Outside the newsroom she works on materials physics and stargazes through a home telescope, which keeps her close to how measurement error actually behaves. She does not publish a health claim without a named source and the underlying data.

Newsroom →

Comments

0
  1. No comments yet — be the first.

Write a comment

Comments are public. We do not publish abuse, spam or advertising.